• Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Media
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Media
  • Podcasts
  • Contact

pinned publications

What does Southeast Asia want from a new US administration?

Donald Trump’s return to the White House and his commitment to his policy agenda will challenge U.S. relations with Southeast Asia. This compilation looks to understand how the region views its relationship with the United States and to examine whether the region’s goals and interests can be aligned with those of a new administration.


Featuring essays by Lina A. Alexandra (Indonesia), Thomas Benjamin Daniel (Malaysia), Charmaine Misalucha-Willoughby (Philippines), Fuadi Pitsuwan (Thailand), and Nguyen Hung Son (Vietnam). Published on 13 January 2025.

Read the compendium here

Speaking in code: Contextualizing large language models in Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia’s developers have sought to democratize AI by building language models that better represent the region’s languages, worldviews, and values. Yet, language is deeply political in a region as multiculturally diverse and complex as Southeast Asia. Can localized large language models truly preserve and project the region’s nuances?


Written and researched with Binya Kanitroj. Published as a Carnegie Endowment for International Peace paper on 6 January 2025.


Watch the video explainer here: https://carnegieendowment.org/videos/2025/04/western-bias-in-ai-why-local-models-matter-for-southeast-asia?lang=en

Read the paper here

Subsea communication cables in Southeast Asia: A comprehensive approach is needed

By treating undersea cables as critical infrastructure, Southeast Asian stakeholders can better manage geopolitical, environmental, and more conventional risks threatening cable resilience.


Published as a Carnegie Endowment for International Peace paper on 18 December 2024.

Read the paper here

China through a Southeast Asia lens

Because strategic, economic, and ideological perceptions of China contain multiple, sometimes contradictory facets in Southeast Asia, receptions of and responses to Beijing diverge across and within state lines.


This collection of essays was edited by Evan A. Feigenbaum. Introduction by Chong Ja Ian and me. Published on 7 November 2024. 

Read the compendium here

Advancing a more global agenda for trustworthy artificial intelligence

International AI governance enshrines assumptions from the more well-resourced Global North. These efforts must adapt to better account for the range of harms AI incurs globally.


This paper, co-written with Aubra Anthony and Lakshmee Sharma, provided an introductory overview to a project aimed at amplifying ideas and perspectives from groups and geographic areas that lack strong representation in current global discussions about AI. The project offers a series of papers from Carnegie scholars and affiliates focused on how those beyond the Global North experience AI, and how approaches to governance could adapt to these realities to improve AI’s trustworthiness for the Global Majority. For more on the project: https://carnegieendowment.org/programs/technology-and-international-affairs/artificial-intelligence-and-the-global-majority?lang=en


This introductory piece was published as a Carnegie Endowment for International Peace paper on 30 April 2024.

Read the intro here

Entangled: Southeast Asia and the geopolitics of undersea cables

This article demonstrates that Southeast Asia has been involved in undersea cable networks since the 19th century and that these cables are increasingly valuable to regional countries—but also increasingly vulnerable. It argues that US-China competition is resulting in a fragmentation of cable networks, and consequently, Southeast Asian countries are increasingly being forced to choose between infrastructure provided by China and infrastructure provided by the US and its partners. 


This article also argues that the region has been remiss in not taking a more comprehensive approach to the construction, routing, and protection of undersea cables. It concludes with recommendations for the creation of a new multi-stakeholder council of interagency officials, industry captains, and foreign policy and security practitioners to discuss cross-cutting technological issues, including undersea cables.


Published in Indo-Pacific Outlook | Volume 1, Issue 5 by the University of Hawai’i at Mānoa on 7 February 2024.

Read the paper here

Latest publications

Local AI models will live and die by the quality of their data sets

Local AI models will live and die by the quality of their data sets

Local AI models will live and die by the quality of their data sets

Building local AI models on local knowledge requires nations to be certain about their terms of reference. 


South China Morning Post, 2 September 2025: https://www.scmp.com/opinion/asia-opinion/article/3323872/local-ai-models-will-live-and-die-quality-their-data-sets

Why Silicon Valley signing up to nationalism puts Asia on edge

Local AI models will live and die by the quality of their data sets

Local AI models will live and die by the quality of their data sets

U.S. tech dominance, led by the private sector and supported by the government, has only accelerated the inevitability of the military-technology complex in the digital age.


South China Morning Post, 2 July 2025: https://www.scmp.com/opinion/world-opinion/article/3316416/why-silicon-valley-signing-nationalism-puts-asia-edge

What it means to build local AI

Local AI models will live and die by the quality of their data sets

How different regions are rethinking their approaches to subsea cables

The rapid adoption of US-made, Anglophone large language models has led developers in Southeast Asia to focus on building AI tools that can speak to the region in its own words. But creating truly local AI models also means capturing the deep cultural and historical nuances that have been encoded in language.


Project Syndicate, 25 June 2025: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/local-ai-accounting-for-language-culture-history-different-forms-of-sense-making-by-elina-noor-2025-06

How different regions are rethinking their approaches to subsea cables

As Malaysia’s Huawei chip storm shows, sovereign AI is a fraught pursuit

How different regions are rethinking their approaches to subsea cables

This critical infrastructure’s governance and security varies from region to region, and great power dynamics are one of the factors shaping investment, deployment, repair, and resilience. 


This piece stems from a project with Carnegie Endowment for International Peace colleagues, Jane Munga, Sophia Besch, and Erik Brown


Emissary, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 5 June 2025: https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2025/06/subsea-cable-approaches-lessons-europe-africa-southeast-asia?lang=en

As Malaysia’s Huawei chip storm shows, sovereign AI is a fraught pursuit

As Malaysia’s Huawei chip storm shows, sovereign AI is a fraught pursuit

As Malaysia’s Huawei chip storm shows, sovereign AI is a fraught pursuit

For third states, what is there to differentiate a Chinese AI stack from an US one when both lock in external reliance in the longer term?


South China Morning Post, 1 June 2025: https://www.scmp.com/opinion/asia-opinion/article/3312531/malaysias-huawei-chip-storm-shows-sovereign-ai-fraught-pursuit

Malaysian flag gaffes expose how AI can inflame deep social divisions

As Malaysia’s Huawei chip storm shows, sovereign AI is a fraught pursuit

As Malaysia’s Huawei chip storm shows, sovereign AI is a fraught pursuit

The costs of technological convenience and presumed efficiency can be terrifyingly high, especially when communal and national identities are at stake.


South China Morning Post, 6 May 2025: https://www.scmp.com/opinion/asia-opinion/article/3308971/malaysian-flag-gaffes-expose-how-ai-can-inflame-deep-social-divisions

In US-China rivalry, Southeast Asia is no one’s prize. Why do we insist otherwise?

BRICS expansion and the future of world order: Perspectives from member states, partners, and aspira

In US-China rivalry, Southeast Asia is no one’s prize. Why do we insist otherwise?

That no relationship can be simplified to a dichotomy should be blindingly obvious.


The Interpreter, Lowy Institute, 24 April 2025:


https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/us-china-rivalry-southeast-asia-no-one-s-prize-why-do-we-insist-otherwise


AI competition in Southeast Asia: Can Malaysia's chairmanship make a difference?

BRICS expansion and the future of world order: Perspectives from member states, partners, and aspira

In US-China rivalry, Southeast Asia is no one’s prize. Why do we insist otherwise?

ASEAN could consider a different approach to AI if it allows itself to strategize beyond the strictures of the global supply chain and obsession with growth figures.


Asia-Pacific Leadership Network, 10 April 2025:


https://www.apln.network/projects/asia-dialogue-on-china-us-relations/ai-competition-in-southeast-asia-can-malaysias-asean-chairmanship-make-a-difference


BRICS expansion and the future of world order: Perspectives from member states, partners, and aspira

BRICS expansion and the future of world order: Perspectives from member states, partners, and aspira

BRICS expansion and the future of world order: Perspectives from member states, partners, and aspira

The potential of BRICS members and partner countries to fulfill their individual aspirations via BRICS hinges on what vision of the future of world order ultimately wins out within BRICS.


Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 31 March 2025:

https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/03/brics-expansion-and-the-future-of-world-order-perspectives-from-member-states-partners-and-aspirants?lang=en&trk=article-ssr-frontend-pulse_little-text-block

Copyright © 2025 Elina Noor - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept